Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a overall score of 97.6 against 79.3. Galaxy Fold's design is noticeably thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it's much heavier and was released about 16 months before. Galaxy Fold features a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s screen, because although the Galaxy Fold has a quite lower pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better 1536 x 2152 resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.