Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s score of 79.3. Galaxy Note 20's body is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), even when both were released with only 5 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has better video frame rate, a camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Stylus (2021), giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.