Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a overall score of 81.2 against 79.3. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is much lighter and just a bit thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite worse pixel count in each screen inch. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a way bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. Moto G Stylus (2021) captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.