Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Stylus (2021), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021). Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much more MP back camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus (2021) has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.