Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Moto G Stylus (2021), with a general score of 94.8 against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older cellphone than Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Galaxy S20 counts with a brighter display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. Moto G Stylus (2021) captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture for better images in low light situations and a lot higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better memory for apps and games than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Moto G Stylus (2021) one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.