Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), with a 98 score against 79.3. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but it is a bit heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a higher screen density and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery life than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much better video definition.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.