Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 387 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 global score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, way thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021).
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a brighter display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Both have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.