Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 general score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021). Both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much more mega pixels camera and a much higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.