Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s 79.3 score. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), it's body is thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch in the display. The Moto G Stylus (2021) takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations and a camera with a way better resolution.
Moto G Stylus (2021) features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.