Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 299.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a global score of 92.3 against 79.3. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were only released 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is lighter and thinner. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.