Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner but noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments and a camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.