Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a global score of 90.6 against 79.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Moto G Stylus (2021) were only released 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is incredibly heavier but thinner than the Moto G Stylus (2021).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a quite inferior pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus (2021) captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a lot larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.