Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.51 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black and Aurora white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus (2021)'s general score of 79.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction has the same thickness than Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's a little bit lighter. Moto G Stylus (2021) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both have extremely similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with superior battery life than Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.