Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 82.1 score against 80. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) body is a lot newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Although Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.