Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), having a score of 83.8 against 82.1. Galaxy A50's construction is thinner and much lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.