Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), with an 85.5 score against 82.1. Even though Galaxy A51 is older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), it's body is somewhat thinner and way lighter. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit higher screen pixel density. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a slightly better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit superior processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.