Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s 82.1 score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although they were only released 3 months apart. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back camera and a much higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy A52 5G's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s one, they have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and the same 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.