Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s general score of 82.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is thinner and lighter than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), even though it was released about 10 months before. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a quite higher display density. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.