Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is slightly better than Galaxy Note 5, having a overall score of 82.1 against 79.3. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s construction is newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note 5. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a newer 11 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.