Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), getting a 93.4 score against 82.1. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has Android 11, giving some extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy S22 is a somewhat thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although both were released with only a few months difference.
Galaxy S22 has a little better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has an incredibly better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 takes greater videos and photos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.