Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 387 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has an overall score of 82.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is a newer device, and it's also a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is also cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.