Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), getting a general score of 88.5 against 82.1. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but Samsung was able to build it much thinner and lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent more battery size.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.