Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 399.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s general score of 82.1. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an older cellphone than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.