Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-14 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Cosmic Emerald | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s score of 82.1. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is extremely heavier but also much thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021).
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way better video resolution. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.