Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 12 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2020) is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), with an 81.5 score against 71.9. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a noticeably thinner and notably lighter phone than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) comes with Android 12 OS.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone SE (2020) counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a really smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels.
The iPhone SE (2020) has just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 175% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.