Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), having an 81.3 score against 71.9. LG V35 ThinQ is a notably lighter and thinner cellphone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). LG V35 ThinQ has a really superior processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixel amount per inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a lot worse 16 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a much better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.