Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)'s 71.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is way lighter and thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. The Galaxy A50s features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.