Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), getting an 85.5 score against 71.9. The Galaxy A51 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12.
Galaxy A51 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features improved battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 has a way better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video and a back camera with a worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.