Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), having an 87.5 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12 version. The Galaxy A71 construction is thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022).
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with a little bit better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. Galaxy A71 has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because it has a much better resolution camera and a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.