Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), with a general score of 98.9 against 71.9. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12 version, providing the user some extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little lighter and thinner phone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022).
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because it has a bit larger display, a higher display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because it has a bigger camera aperture and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.