Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), with an 81.2 score against 71.9. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat thinner and extremely lighter phone than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little bit smaller display. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 takes clearer photos and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a much lower resolution back camera and a smaller diafragm aperture.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.