Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), with a 79.3 score against 71.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022).
Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a way better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a lot worse 16 MP resolution camera, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.