Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), with a 98 score against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is a little heavier but a little bit thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a better display pixels density and a little bit larger screen.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because it has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a battery performance that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.