Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), having a 79.5 score against 71.9. The Galaxy S7 construction is notably lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). The Galaxy S7 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has 4 less processing cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy S7 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a way less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations. Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.