Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), getting a general score of 78.1 against 71.9. Galaxy S7 edge's body is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12 version, giving you some additional features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a back facing camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.