Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), getting an 81 score against 71.9. Even being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's body is a little thicker and just a little heavier than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has Android 12.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). Both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) counts with better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a lot lower 25 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.