Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s score of 76. Even though the iPhone X is notably older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone X features a very superior performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light environments and a much tinier sensor which offers a lot lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Apple iPhone X features as much storage for games and applications as the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.