Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-06-02 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting an 81 score against 76. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. The LG G7 ThinQ body is thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released 5 years before.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a lot better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos in low light situations and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lot lower quality images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.