Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-06-02 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a score of 82.7 against 76. Despite of the fact that the LG G8X ThinQ is way older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The LG G8X ThinQ features a way better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a slightly better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, lower video frame rate and a way smaller camera sensor providing a much worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.