Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s global score of 76. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is lighter and thinner than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it was released 5 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.