Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot older than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A50 has a much powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A50 features a little bit more storage for applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has greater battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.