Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s score of 76. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Galaxy A51 5G is an much older device than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A51 5G features more memory for games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A51 5G captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a less mega pixels back camera, a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.