Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-06-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 76.9 score against 76. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13. The Galaxy A70 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it just a bit lighter and thinner anyway.
Galaxy A70 has a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite worse screen density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A70 also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and video and a lot tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.