Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a lot better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an noticeably older phone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it is just a little thinner and a little lighter anyway. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a way better resolution camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.