Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A9 (2018) is incredibly older than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's body is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with an extremely better processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, a little smaller display and a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a way smaller camera sensor shooting way lower quality videos and pictures and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.