Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. The Galaxy Note 20 is an extremely older device than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little sharper display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit lower pixels density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.