Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably older and a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is still somewhat thinner. These phones use the same Android 13 operating system.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit larger display and a bit greater pixel count per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more storage to install applications and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much faster processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with way more MP.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.