Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a global score of 81.2 against 76. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is incredibly older than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a bit lower screen density, a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a much more powerful processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a lower number of cores and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.