Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-06-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a 79.3 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an notably older device than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much powerful processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores. Galaxy Note 5 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.