Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-02 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 600 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is an a lot older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it's somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note5 has a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a very superior performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a way tinier camera sensor capturing lot worse quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.